You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed a small discrepancy regarding the license for this project. The README file explicitly states that the project is “Licensed under MIT,” but the LICENSE file does not include the title “MIT License” at the top. While the contents of the LICENSE file seem to match the standard MIT License terms, it would be great to have explicit confirmation that this project is indeed licensed under MIT.
Would you be able to confirm whether this is an intentional omission, or if the LICENSE file could be updated to explicitly include “MIT License” at the top for clarity?
This clarification would help ensure that users and organizations relying on the license have a clear understanding of the terms.
Thanks for your work on this project!
Best,
Jeff Olson
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @andris9
I noticed a small discrepancy regarding the license for this project. The README file explicitly states that the project is “Licensed under MIT,” but the LICENSE file does not include the title “MIT License” at the top. While the contents of the LICENSE file seem to match the standard MIT License terms, it would be great to have explicit confirmation that this project is indeed licensed under MIT.
Would you be able to confirm whether this is an intentional omission, or if the LICENSE file could be updated to explicitly include “MIT License” at the top for clarity?
This clarification would help ensure that users and organizations relying on the license have a clear understanding of the terms.
Thanks for your work on this project!
Best,
Jeff Olson
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: