Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Shift machine learning backend to mlr3? #107

Open
nt-williams opened this issue Nov 1, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Shift machine learning backend to mlr3? #107

nt-williams opened this issue Nov 1, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@nt-williams
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@ck37
Copy link

ck37 commented Aug 31, 2023

I think this is a good idea - I’ve shifted my predictive work to mlr3, and piggybacking on it for tmle-related estimation would take advantage of their comparatively high software development capacity. I’m also planning to try out lmtp soon.

@nt-williams
Copy link
Owner Author

@ck37 Glad to hear you plan on trying out lmtp. A shift to mlr3 is tricky since the mlr3 API seems more suited to interactive use. I've been playing around with developing a convenience Super Learner package that uses mlr3 (https://github.com/nt-williams/mlr3superlearner) as a solution. Would be interested in your thoughts on this.

@ck37
Copy link

ck37 commented Sep 8, 2023

The mlr3superlearner package looks awesome; I could see it really helping people, and the code efficiency is huge.

Just out of curiosity though, what is it that makes you feel mlr3 is best for interactive usage - the large amount of code needed to implement an ensemble?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants