You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When defining the package requirements there's a condition that takes into account RHEL7 (if condition) and RHEL8 (else condition), but since we have started working on the RHEL9->10 upgrade this might be wrong. I recommend that you review it and decide the best way forward.
At the moment, and in my PR, I am adding an additional condition to check if the system is RHEL9.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @ikerexxe , can you elaborate more on the possible error? I am not sure whether I understand your concerns. Do you know about some dependencies that are broken or incorrect regarding the existing code? If it is just because definitions in the beginning of the file are split into 3 branches (el7, 8, 9) and dependencies just in 7 and 8+, it's because I haven't discovered that time any difference between el8 & el9, so there is no sense to have empty (or just duplicated) block for el9 dependencies. If you have any specific concern about any deps, I will check it. It's possible I missed something. But so far I do not see anything specific when looking at it.
Description
When defining the package requirements there's a condition that takes into account RHEL7 (if condition) and RHEL8 (else condition), but since we have started working on the RHEL9->10 upgrade this might be wrong. I recommend that you review it and decide the best way forward.
At the moment, and in my PR, I am adding an additional condition to check if the system is RHEL9.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: