-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
How to get a map of GO Cell Components to CL classes? #2317
Comments
Such could even be part of the Cell Guides in cellxgene, indicating these gene ontology connections and/or adding markers to a new tab. (pinging @jahilton) |
Possible to get these from UberGraph. I can share some queries. We can also link cells to GO processes. Part of our plan over the next year is to improve these links. They will also be a key part of a knowledge graph we are building. |
@dosumis I was playing with this idea on Ubergraph: https://api.triplydb.com/s/ZcjBxmcVp
and https://api.triplydb.com/s/jKyiXFERl
They are fun queries, but I imagine quite similar to yours |
This issue has not seen any activity in the past 6 months; it will be closed automatically in one year from now if no action is taken. |
Hello!
I am looking for ways to get a map of cell types in CL to Cell Components in the Gene Ontology.
I think this can be a path to get a set of markers for classes in some smart ways, as some Cell Components are very type specific (related to some things @dosumis was thinking)
Some mappings are explicit, e.g.neuron projection (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/term/GO:0043005) has a "part of --> neuron" axiom.
But there are some other mappings that seem possible, e.g. "glutamatergic synapse" --> "glutamatergic neuron", but I don't know if they are asserted somewhere.
Examples of similar class-specific components include:
Maybe using ROBOT/OAK to get a 3 column table with already asserted Cell Component, CL Term and Source Ontology could be a starting point. Likely some manual curation needed to fill gaps and get a complete picture.
A natural second step would be getting the genes annotated to such Cell Components. Maybe this will provide a nice CL signature, complementary to scRNA-seq where markers are dependent on the background.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: