Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NR: add simple subproperty of has participant #489

Closed
wdduncan opened this issue Aug 26, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #490
Closed

NR: add simple subproperty of has participant #489

wdduncan opened this issue Aug 26, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #490
Assignees

Comments

@wdduncan
Copy link
Collaborator

In ENVO, a number of axioms use a cardinality restriction with has participant. But, this violated the DL profile b/c has participantis a non-simple property. For background, see ENVO tickets 1072 and 1182.

One way to address this issue is the create a "fake" simple OP that is a subproperty of has participant in a manner similar to the has component OP.

Not sure what label should be. Some suggestions:

  • has simple participant
  • has direct participant
  • has immediate participant

cc @cmungall @pbuttigieg @matentzn @balhoff

@wdduncan wdduncan self-assigned this Aug 26, 2021
@cmungall
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @wdduncan. The precedent is to add these, we have the analogs for process part of process and continuant part of continuant, so let's go ahead and add, despite the many problems with these OPs.

An interesting aside: I think this is a rare case of an OP where it makes no sense to name an inverse

@wdduncan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cmungall Ok. I'll make a PR.

Any preference for the label?

Another suggestion - has component participant ... follows the "component" naming convention.

@cmungall
Copy link
Contributor

I guess 'has component participant' is best

@balhoff
Copy link
Member

balhoff commented Aug 26, 2021

Have you tried using has primary input or output or even has primary input? I think it depends how loosely you interpret "the goal of process is to modify, consume, or transform c."

@wdduncan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wdduncan commented Aug 26, 2021

Nice suggestion @balhoff !!!
I wasn't aware of those properties.

I'll update the envo ticket, and hold of on doing a PR for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants