-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
Statistics_metal_accumulation.R
480 lines (384 loc) · 16.8 KB
/
Statistics_metal_accumulation.R
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
############ STATISTICS ############
#********************#
#____ LIBRARY _____#
library(ggplot2)
library(reshape2)
library(dplyr)
library(car)
library(pander)
library(moments)
library(dunn.test)
library(psych)
library(gridExtra)
library(ggsignif)
library(ggfortify)
#**********************************#
#____ LOAD AND PREPARE DATA _____#
mydata <- read.csv("metal_concentrations.csv", header = T, sep = ";")
str(mydata) # make sure the variables are in the correct class
#**************************#
#____ DATA OVERVIEW _____#
summary(mydata) # quick first look at global data
# For the visualization in ggplot we have to "melt" the data, so all
# the values are arranged in just one column
m_data <- melt(mydata, variable.name = "Metal")
# Now let's add more info to the dataframe. First we'll add the global
# medians, means, and se (standard error). Second, the same variables
# but for each taxa.
# This data will be very useful info to add to the visualizations
m_data <- m_data %>% group_by(Metal) %>%
mutate(median_global=median(value)) %>%
mutate(mean_global=mean(value)) %>%
mutate(se_global=sd(value)/sqrt(length(value))) %>%
group_by(Metal, Taxa) %>%
mutate(median_taxa=median(value)) %>%
mutate(mean_taxa=mean(value)) %>%
mutate(se_taxa=sd(value)/sqrt(length(value)))
attach(m_data)
# Here I create a customized palette for each metal
pal_metals <- c(As="darkorange1", Se="darkcyan",
Cd ="chartreuse4" , Hg="maroon4")
ggplot(unique(m_data[c(1,2,8,9)]), aes(x =Metal, y=mean_taxa, fill=Metal))+
geom_bar(stat="identity", show.legend = F) +
facet_wrap(~Taxa) +
scale_fill_manual(values=pal_metals) +
geom_errorbar(aes(ymin=mean_taxa-se_taxa, ymax=mean_taxa+se_taxa),
width=0.3,
position=position_dodge(0.9), size = 0.8) +
geom_hline(yintercept = unique(mean_global)[1], color="darkorange1",
size=1, linetype = 2) +
geom_hline(yintercept = unique(mean_global)[2], color="darkcyan",
size=1, linetype = 2) +
geom_hline(yintercept = unique(mean_global)[3], color="chartreuse4",
size=1, linetype = 2) +
geom_hline(yintercept = unique(mean_global)[4], color="maroon4",
size=1, linetype = 2) +
labs(title= "Metal concentration means and standar errors for each taxa",
subtitle = "*dotted lines show the global metal concentration",
x=NULL, y = "μg/g dw") +
theme(plot.title = element_text(size=16, face = "bold"),
plot.subtitle=element_text(size=13, face="italic"),
axis.text = element_text(size=12, face = "bold", color = "black"),
strip.text.x = element_text(size = 14, face = "bold"),
axis.title.y = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"))
# At first look we could think that there may be signifficant differences
# in the next cases:
# As -> the three taxas
# Se -> Hepta vs Hydro and Rhya
# Cd -> Hepta vs Hydro and Rhya
# Hg -> none
# In the next step we will prove if our hypothesis is true or not
#*********************************#
#____ STATISTICAL ANALYSIS _____#
# STEP A) NORMAL DISTRIBUTION?
attach(mydata)
# A.2) SHAPIRO-WILK
shapiro_fun <- function(x){
pvalue <- vector()
result <- vector()
for(i in 2:ncol(x)){
sw <- tapply(unlist(x[i]), x$Taxa, shapiro.test)
result <- append(result, sw)
}
for(i in 1:length(result)) {
pvalue <- append(result[[i]][[2]], pvalue)
}
return(round(rev(pvalue),3))
}
sw <- shapiro_fun(mydata)
# A.2) ASIMETRY
skewness_fun <- function(x){
result <- vector()
for(i in 2:ncol(x)){
ske <- tapply(unlist(x[i]), x$Taxa, skewness)
result <- append(result, unname(ske))
}
return(round(result,2))
}
ske <- skewness_fun(mydata)
ord_ske <- ske[c(1,4,7,10,2,5,8,11,3,6,9,12)] # for this case we need
# to sort the values from the result acord accordingly
# We can save this results into a dataframe
dt <- data.frame("Taxa"= rep(levels(mydata$Taxa), each=4),
"Metal" = rep(levels(m_data$Metal),3),
"Shapiro-Wilk" = sw,
"Skewness" = ord_ske)
# A.3) LEVENE
levene_fun <- function(x){
value <- vector()
result <- vector()
for(i in 2:ncol(x)){
lev <- leveneTest(unlist(x[i]), x$Taxa, center = mean)
result <- append(result, lev[[3]][1])
}
return(round(result,3))
}
lev <- levene_fun(mydata)
dt_lev <- data.frame("Metal" = levels(m_data$Metal),
"Levene Test" =lev)
# RESULTS:
# Normal distribution:
set.caption("*p<0.01; **-2<p>2")
pandoc.table(dt, emphasize.strong.cells = which(dt > 2 | dt < -2,
arr.ind = TRUE),
emphasize.cells=(which(dt < 0.01,
arr.ind = TRUE)))
# Homogeneity of variance:
set.caption("*p<0.01")
pandoc.table(dt_lev, emphasize.cells=(which(dt_lev < 0.01,
arr.ind = TRUE)))
#################
# INTERPRETATION:
# To better understand the results of Shapiro-Wilk we can perform a
# Q-Q plot, which is commonly used to detect deviations from the normal
# distribution.
# Let's take two SW values as examples, one <0.01 and the other >0.01
# For example: Cd in both Hepatgeniidae (0.456) and Rhyacophilidae (0.000)
par(mfrow=c(1,2))
qqnorm(mydata[Taxa=="Heptageniidae", "Cd"],
main = paste("Normal distribution",
"[Cd] in Heptageniidae",
sep="\n"),
pch=16, cex=1.5, col="firebrick3")
qqline(mydata[Taxa=="Heptageniidae", "Cd"], lwd=2)
text(x=-1, y=2.7, "Shapiro-Wilk = 0.456",
cex = 1.3)
qqnorm(mydata[Taxa=="Rhyacophilidae", "Cd"],
main = paste("Non-normal distribution",
"[Cd] in Rhyacophilidae",
sep="\n"),
pch=16, cex=1.5, col="firebrick3")
qqline(mydata[Taxa=="Rhyacophilidae", "Cd"], lwd=2)
text(x=-1, y=0.9, "Shapiro-Wilk = 0.000",
cex = 1.3)
# Cd in Heptageniidae fits the QQplot, Cd in Rhyacophilidae doesn't
# Let's now visualize a histogram to understand the skewness.
# In the case of Cd Hepatgeniidae the value is 0.30 and in Hydropsychidae
# is 2.60 (out of range)
hist(mydata[Taxa=="Heptageniidae", "Cd"], breaks = 12,
main="[Cd] in Heptageniidae", xlab = NULL)
lines(density(mydata[Taxa=="Heptageniidae", "Cd"]), lwd=2, col="darkblue")
hist(mydata[Taxa=="Hydropsychidae", "Cd"], breaks = 12,
main="[Cd] in Hydropsychidae", xlab = NULL)
lines(density(mydata[Taxa=="Hydropsychidae", "Cd"]), lwd=2, col="red3")
# In the case of Hydropsychidae the density line is skewed to the left
# Finally, to better understand the Levene's test we can build some
# boxplots and pay attention to the whiskers.
pal_taxa <- c(Heptageniidae="firebrick3",
Hydropsychidae="springgreen3",
Rhyacophilidae ="slateblue")
ggplot(m_data, aes(x=m_data$Taxa, y=m_data$value, fill=m_data$Taxa)) +
geom_boxplot(show.legend = F) +
labs(title= "Metal concentrations in each taxa") +
facet_wrap(~ m_data$Metal, scales = "free") +
scale_fill_manual(values=pal_taxa) +
theme(plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5, size = 18,
vjust = 5, face = "bold"),
plot.margin = unit(c(0.5,1,1,1), "cm"),
axis.title = element_blank(),
axis.text = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
strip.text.x = element_text(size = 16, face = "bold"))
# Heptageniidae shows a lot of variance in all metals except in Hg,
# that's why Levene fails for the first three metals
# * NOTE:
# One important thing to consider is the amount of samples that we are
# working with, less than 30 for each metal and taxa. The smallest the
# population the harder the probability of having normal ditribution.
# Outliers can have a big impact.
# STEP B) DATA TRANSFORMATION AND SECOND ROUND CHECKING DISTRIBUTION
# None of the metals pass the three test we stablished on all taxa.
# Transforming the data we may achieve normal distribution, so that's
# the next step. Take note though, that in Cd in Hydropsychidae showed
# skewness, a parameter that does not change even if the data is
# transformed,so we already know that the data referring to Cd must be
# treated with non-parametric test.
# Data transformation
log_data <- round(data.frame(apply(mydata[-1], 2, log10)),3)
log_data <- cbind("Taxa"=mydata$Taxa, log_data)
# Run Shapiro-Wilk and Levene's Test
sw_log <- shapiro_fun(log_data)
dt_sw_log <- data.frame("Taxa"= rep(levels(mydata$Taxa), each=4),
"Metal" = rep(levels(m_data$Metal),3),
"Shapiro-Wilk" = sw_log)
lev_log <- levene_fun(log_data)
dt_lev_log <- data.frame("Metal" = levels(m_data$Metal),
"Levene Test" =lev_log)
# RESULTS:
set.caption("*p<0.01")
pandoc.table(dt_sw_log, emphasize.cells=(which(dt_sw_log < 0.01,
arr.ind = TRUE)))
set.caption("*p<0.01")
pandoc.table(dt_lev_log, emphasize.cells=(which(dt_lev_log < 0.01,
arr.ind = TRUE)))
# So now, all cases pass the Levene's Test, and only two cases do not
# pass the SW -> As and Cd.
# This means that we can perform parametric test with the transformed
# data for Se and Hg, and non-parametric test for As and Cd with
# original data.
# STEP C) SIGNIFFICANT DIFFERENCES?
## C.1) PARAMETRIC TESTS
attach(log_data)
### C.1.1) ONE WAY ANOVA (Global differences)
anova_fun <- function(x){
result <- vector()
for(i in 2:ncol(x)){
lin_mod <- lm(unlist(x[i]) ~ x$Taxa)
ano <- anova(lin_mod)
result <- append(result, ano[[5]][1])
}
return(round(result,3))
}
ano <- anova_fun(log_data[c("Taxa", "Se", "Hg")])
dt_ano <- data.frame("Metal" = c("Se", "Hg"),
"Anova" = ano)
set.caption("*p<0.05")
pandoc.table(dt_ano, emphasize.cells=(which(dt_ano < 0.05,
arr.ind = TRUE)))
### C.1.2) BONFERRONI (Post-Hoc, paired comparison)
bonferroni_fun <- function(x){
comparisons <- vector()
values <- vector()
result <- list()
for(i in 2:ncol(x)){
bon <- pairwise.t.test(unlist(x[i]), x$Taxa, p.adj="bonferroni")
values <- append(values, bon[[3]][c(1,2,4)])
comparisons <- list(paste(colnames(bon$p.value)[1],
row.names(bon$p.value)[1], sep = " - "),
paste(colnames(bon$p.value)[1],
row.names(bon$p.value)[2], sep = " - "),
paste(colnames(bon$p.value)[2],
row.names(bon$p.value)[2], sep = " - "))
}
result <- list(comparisons, round(values,3))
return(result)
}
bon <- bonferroni_fun(log_data[c("Taxa", "Se", "Hg")])
# I also included Hg into the test even though the Anova showed that
# there wasn't differences just so you can see how all pvalues for
# this variable are indeed >0.05 (not signifficant)
dt_bon <- data.frame("Comparisons"=unlist(bon[[1]]),
"Se"=bon[[2]][1:3],
"Hg"=bon[[2]][4:6])
set.caption("*p<0.05")
pandoc.table(dt_bon, emphasize.cells=(which(dt_bon < 0.05,
arr.ind = TRUE)))
## C.2) NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS
attach(mydata)
### C.2.1) KRUSKAL-WALLIS (Global differences)
kruskal_fun <- function(x){
result <- vector()
for(i in 2:ncol(x)){
kru <- kruskal.test(unlist(x[i]), x$Taxa, center = mean)
result <- append(result, kru$p.value)
}
return(round(result,3))
}
kru <- kruskal_fun(mydata[c("Taxa", "As", "Cd")])
dt_kru <- data.frame("Metal" = c("As", "Cd"),
"Kruskal-Wallis" = kru)
set.caption("*p<0.05")
pandoc.table(dt_kru, emphasize.cells=(which(dt_kru < 0.05,
arr.ind = TRUE)))
### C.2.2) DUNN (Post-Hoc, paired comparison)
dunn_fun <- function(x){
comparisons <- vector()
values <- vector()
result <- list()
for(i in 2:ncol(x)){
dun <- dunn.test(unlist(x[i]), x$Taxa)
values <- append(values, dun$P)
comparisons <- dun$comparisons
}
result <- list(comparisons, round(values,3))
return(result)
}
dun <- dunn_fun(mydata[c("Taxa", "As", "Cd")])
dt_dunn <- data.frame("Comparisons"=dun[[1]], "As"=dun[[2]][1:3],
"Cd"=dun[[2]][4:6])
set.caption("*p<0.05")
pandoc.table(dt_dunn, emphasize.cells=(which(dt_dunn < 0.05,
arr.ind = TRUE)))
# SUMMARY:
# Now that we know which cases have signifficant differences we can
# visualize the boxplots from before with annotations of this cases
# thanks to the geom_signif() function in ggplot2
As_plot <- ggplot(mydata, aes(x=Taxa, y=As, fill=Taxa)) +
geom_boxplot(show.legend = F) +
scale_fill_manual(values=pal_taxa) +
labs(title="As") +
theme(plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5, size = 20,
vjust = 5, face = "bold"),
plot.margin = unit(c(0.5,1,1,1), "cm"),
axis.text = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
axis.title.x = element_blank(),
axis.title.y = element_blank()) +
geom_signif(comparisons = list(c("Heptageniidae","Hydropsychidae"),
c("Heptageniidae","Rhyacophilidae"),
c("Hydropsychidae","Rhyacophilidae")),
map_signif_level=TRUE, step_increase=0.2,
annotations = "*", size = 1,
textsize=10, col="gray25", vjust=0.6)
Se_plot <- ggplot(mydata, aes(x=Taxa, y=Se, fill=Taxa)) +
geom_boxplot(show.legend = F) +
scale_fill_manual(values=pal_taxa) +
labs(title="Se") +
theme(plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5, size = 20,
vjust = 5, face = "bold"),
plot.margin = unit(c(0.5,1,1,1), "cm"),
axis.text = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
axis.title.x = element_blank(),
axis.title.y = element_blank()) +
geom_signif(comparisons = list(c("Heptageniidae","Hydropsychidae"),
c("Heptageniidae","Rhyacophilidae"),
c("Hydropsychidae","Rhyacophilidae")),
map_signif_level=TRUE, step_increase=0.2,
annotations = "*", size = 1,
textsize=10, col="gray25", vjust=0.6)
Cd_plot <- ggplot(mydata, aes(x=Taxa, y=Cd, fill=Taxa)) +
geom_boxplot(show.legend = F) +
scale_fill_manual(values=pal_taxa) +
labs(title="Cd") +
theme(plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5, size = 20,
vjust = 5, face = "bold"),
plot.margin = unit(c(0.5,1,1,1), "cm"),
axis.text = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
axis.title.x = element_blank(),
axis.title.y = element_blank()) +
geom_signif(comparisons = list(c("Heptageniidae","Hydropsychidae"),
c("Heptageniidae","Rhyacophilidae")),
map_signif_level=T, step_increase=0.2,
annotations = "*", size = 1,
textsize=10, col="gray25", vjust=0.6)
Hg_plot <- ggplot(mydata, aes(x=Taxa, y=Hg, fill=Taxa)) +
geom_boxplot(show.legend = F) +
scale_fill_manual(values=pal_taxa) +
labs(title="Hg") +
theme(plot.title = element_text(hjust = 0.5, size = 20,
vjust = 1, face = "bold"),
plot.margin = unit(c(0.5,1,1,1), "cm"),
axis.text = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
axis.title.x = element_blank(),
axis.title.y = element_blank())
grid.arrange(As, Se, Cd, Hg, ncol=2)
######################################
# As a final step we can check the correlation between the metals and the
# taxa with a PCA
autoplot(prcomp(mydata[,2:5]), data = mydata, col = "Taxa", size=3,
loadings=T, loadings.colour = "black", loadings.label=T,
loadings.label.size=7, loadings.label.colour = "black",
frame = T, frame.type = "norm") +
scale_color_manual(values=pal_taxa) +
theme(plot.margin = unit(c(0.5,4,0.5,4), "cm"),
axis.text = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
axis.title.x = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
axis.title.y = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
legend.text = element_text(size = 12, face = "bold"),
legend.title = element_blank(),
legend.position = c(0, 1),
legend.justification = c(-5, 1),
legend.background = element_rect(fill="transparent"))
# So most influencial metals in taxa differentiation are As and Se;
# Cd has a bit of differentiation power towards Heptageniidae;
# Hg shows same accumulation levels in three taxa
#***********************#
#____ THE END!!! _____#