Add contentfilter container image

[kelson42]

This is necessary to create images for Bard.

Kind of follower of offspot/kiwix-hotspot#613.

[rgaudin]

Wouldn't this be part of our project.json ? Unless necessary, I suggest we keep our kiwix-related tickets that don't affect the creator outside this repository

[kelson42]

@rgaudin I don't expect random container images to work out-of-the box with image-creator because (at least):

• Image should fullfill a few requirements (still to be defined)
• Things should be tested
• Catalogue should be updated
• Here it would deal with the reverse proxy, so some kind of integration work is probably necessary
• If implemented, might be harder/not a good idea to have this only for a subset of apps.

This is why, I have put it here first. Like a few other containers (for example the captive portal, reverse proxy, ...), both orgs might use it.

What would be concretly a better place? Offspot/content-filter?

[rgaudin]

image-creator is a software for building the image. What you are mentioning is all very important but that's part of the solution, not the creator. There will be zero code about this in this repo (some might require tighter integration, most likely at base-image level) so issues about those should not pollute this repo.

We should to discuss whether we want a single repo to share code and issues about all those pieces and/or/if we need an overview one as well.

[rgaudin]

Now that bard has shipped and we know it won't reconcile its codebase, is this image/feature still relevant generally ? Precisely: should we implement this? drop it? implement it later?

[kelson42]

@rgaudin It's important we maintain it IMO and provide it as (optional?) tool in the imager.

[kelson42]

@rgaudin It's strategic for Kiwix that this tool is available, better soon than later, in Kiwix Hotspot. The reason is that we need to it, to remove the duty of censorhip of the shoulders of Kiwix.

[kelson42]

@rgaudin I suspect this issue can be closed?

[rgaudin]

There is an image but it's not working. It's just the bard code and it requires both work on the image and in the proxy configuration to make it work.
I found it well located at container-images for that reason

[kelson42]

@rgaudin How much additional work would be needed to have it as proper feature?
@Popolechien To me it would be really nice to have this in the feature set... but not sure about the priority

[rgaudin]

I'd say 1d ± .5d

[Popolechien]

Honestly to me it is super-low priority. There's no actual demand for it atm. I'd file it under "nice to have".

[kelson42]

My main concern is having work done not reaching end-users. I would propose to:

• Count it as feature (and advert it)
• if anybody complains or ask about it, then complete quickly the implementation