-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 298
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Collect images built by Fedora and reconfigure samples-operator to use those #167
Comments
Here are some fedora based images I created and uploaded to Dockerhub. Should I build and upload more? cragr/mysql-80-fedora |
That would be great, but we can't yet include them in the OKD. Lets have them built and maintained by Fedora so that we'd make sure these don't go stale and get security updates frequently |
TODO:
|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859387 I read through Container Review Process and am attempting to become a contributor so I can update the container images and push them to the fedora registry. There are many other fedora images I can submit but I want to see how this one goes before I put in the additional work. What about the CentOS7 images can we start with those while we wait on the Fedora Container SIG/Review Process? |
This link appears to have everything needed for CentOS 7 images: https://github.com/openshift/library/tree/master/community CentOS 7 image list (incomplete): mariadb-container s2i-python-container s2i-php-container s2i-perl-container nginx-container s2i-nodejs-container s2i-ruby-container httpd-container redis-container postgresql-container mysql-container varnish-container mongodb-container cassandra-container |
I created an issue on these repos to see how it goes before I work on the rest. |
The fedora:latest base image is 183MB compared to ubuntu:latest (73.9MB), debian:stable-slim (69.2MB) or debian:latest(114MB). Do we need everything that is in it or would a smaller base image by preferable? |
There's a Additionally, @asamalik is working on shrinking the base more without doing chainsaw maneuvers that those images you mention do (essentially clean setups instead of hacksaw ones). |
In OKD 4.6 samples operator would use imagestreams defined in https://github.com/openshift/library/tree/master/community, any additional imagestreams need to be submitted there. There is no easy fix for OKD 4.5 though, as it may break existing installations |
Do you know the currently estimated release date for 4.6? |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
/lifecycle frozen |
All Software Collection images now live on quay.io registry. CentOS 7 is here: |
See: After that merges, someone will have to go through https://github.com/openshift/library/blob/master/community.yaml and for check all the imported imagestreams whether automated Fedora/C9S/public UBI builds exist. I've started with that here: |
See https://registry.fedoraproject.org/ - OKD should promote Fedora content and inject a configuration to samples-operator, which adds these imagestreams.
TODO:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: