-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Polygon discrepancies pdf vs figure #455
Comments
cc @will-moore |
@Tom-TBT Thanks for your input on this issue. That comment: I guess we could do as use suggest and paint the Shapes onto the panels as we do for TIFF export. That should fix this issue, but I wonder if many users would mind? How useful it is to have the Shapes as separate vectors on a PDF? Do users ever open the PDF figures in e.g. Illustrator and edit those Shapes? In cases where the panel is low resolution, they might not appear so nice if we paint them onto the images? |
Found #330, a suggestion from you to finalize PDF figure exports in a postscript editor. |
See the figure on https://outreach.openmicroscopy.org/figure/file/173681/ . When exported as pdf, the lines in the figure are much less than on the pdf. Also, they protrude into the canvas on the pdf. Note that the images were intentionally rendered black just for the purpose of not exposing the figure images publicly before taking the screenshots below.
PDF:
Figure:
![Screenshot 2022-02-04 at 13 49 00](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2478303/152540161-d246a621-fc8b-4159-939c-8e6dd530767a.png)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: