You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I produce a lot of plate data and am a happy user of omero.figure to create panels of these images. These panels tend to get big and it's really easy to make c&p mistakes. To avoid this, it would be really helpful to automatically add the well name and field name as a label to each image. At the moment "Image Name" and "Dataset Name" can be added automatically, but neither well, field, nor plate name. I would really appreciate if these options could be added too. The field name could be a simple number, or the style it is already shown in omero.web:
Possible ideas:
Would be both fine and making at least my life definitely easier. Any other implementation would be fine too, as long as the label is populated automatically. Would that be possible?
Of course, sometimes the field is not important and the well name is sufficient, so I would suggest to keep it variable to the user if which labels are used.
Thanks in advance,
Anna
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Will,
I produce a lot of plate data and am a happy user of omero.figure to create panels of these images. These panels tend to get big and it's really easy to make c&p mistakes. To avoid this, it would be really helpful to automatically add the well name and field name as a label to each image. At the moment "Image Name" and "Dataset Name" can be added automatically, but neither well, field, nor plate name. I would really appreciate if these options could be added too. The field name could be a simple number, or the style it is already shown in omero.web:
Possible ideas:
![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/61734239/295937219-637cc4cb-8fa5-4354-8360-a45e64ace9b8.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.dxTRqh6CMLzfYvnGqSfG2EtCudepEGPbqpFIz_tYi6U)
Would be both fine and making at least my life definitely easier. Any other implementation would be fine too, as long as the label is populated automatically. Would that be possible?
Of course, sometimes the field is not important and the well name is sufficient, so I would suggest to keep it variable to the user if which labels are used.
Thanks in advance,
Anna
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: