Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 20230323-transaction-fee.md #265

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KshitijChaudhary666
Copy link
Contributor

Updating to introduce Transaction Fee Multiplier T

Updating to introduce Transaction Fee Multiplier T

- Presently, the Flow network fundamentally supports the dynamic adjustment of transaction fees in response to network congestion. The surge factor ('S') facilitates fee modifications during congested periods, ensuring optimal network functionality. Although currently fixed at 1.0, adjustments to this value may be proposed through a FLIP in response to sustained periods of high network demand and saturation.
- Introducing a Transaction Fee Multiplier ('T') alongside the existing surge factor would additionally enhance the adaptability and responsiveness of transaction fees to economic conditions. Additionally, it would cater to future requirements for adjusting the unit cost of transactions on Flow, while also ensuring transparency, ease of understanding, and readability of the formula for our community members.
- **The value of 'T' will be set at 100** to increase the transaction fee by 100 times compared to the current rate, thus increasing costs of each transaction by 100x as shown in the table below.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you use T then the variable shows up like a formula. Consider using ` blocks instead of ' ones.

T vs 'T'

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants