You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would you be willing to support a feature where in the ginkgo outline command we could pass a --simple flag that would allow us to strip away any of the setup containers from the outline output?
The idea is to create a more simplified output that is similar to a BDD style spec output that I can present to my non-technical stake holders. Since the setup containers don't really have any crucial text it would be great to strip that out.
I have post-processing code to strip this out of when I capture the outline output but it would simplify my processing if we pushed this into the outline command.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hey @Dannyb48 - i'm of two minds. on the one hand, the elegance of these kinds of machine readable formats is that downstream users can post-process them (as you've done) to fit their needs so we don't have to add lots of complexity/one-offs to Ginkgo. on the other hand, i get that it would be simpler/easier for you if the tool Just Worked™.
with that said, I think i'd want something that's a bit more well-defined than --simple. perhaps --without-setup-nodes or --only-textual-nodes
Thoughts? if you're up for writing the PR I think something like --without-setup-nodes or --only-textual-nodes would be fine.
Would you be willing to support a feature where in the ginkgo outline command we could pass a
--simple
flag that would allow us to strip away any of the setup containers from the outline output?The idea is to create a more simplified output that is similar to a BDD style spec output that I can present to my non-technical stake holders. Since the setup containers don't really have any crucial text it would be great to strip that out.
I have post-processing code to strip this out of when I capture the outline output but it would simplify my processing if we pushed this into the outline command.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: