Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider adding or aligning to attributes from ICMS to support cost comparisons #292

Open
duncandewhurst opened this issue Feb 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
codelists This issue relates to the codelists ICMS This issue relates to the International Cost Management Standard schema This issue relates to the schema
Milestone

Comments

@duncandewhurst
Copy link
Contributor

ICMS includes various project attributes to support cost comparisons. According to ICMS:

These attributes have been carefully selected and are limited to those that have a direct bearing on the costs.

We should review ICMS's attributes for:

  1. attributes in common with OC4IDS, which may be opportunities to align or improve OC4IDS's field descriptions and/or codelists
  2. attributes missing from OC4IDS, which may be opportunities to add new fields to OC4IDS to support cost comparisons

From a quick look, ICMS's site attributes look like the best candidate for 2.

ICMS also defines many attributes that are specific to particular project types, which may be too much detail for OC4IDS.

@duncandewhurst duncandewhurst added schema This issue relates to the schema codelists This issue relates to the codelists labels Feb 22, 2021
@duncandewhurst duncandewhurst added this to the 1.0 milestone Feb 22, 2021
@duncandewhurst duncandewhurst added the ICMS This issue relates to the International Cost Management Standard label Feb 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
codelists This issue relates to the codelists ICMS This issue relates to the International Cost Management Standard schema This issue relates to the schema
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant