Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
Once folks start collaborating on this, please let us know. At that point, we can create a GitHub team and invite those who wish to and are able to be part of it ❤️ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I think we should consider phrasing this as patterns or cookbooks - guidance is normally something that requires context. With a pattern, the pros and cons of the approach can be highlighted so that people can pick the patterns that fit their context the best. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Excellent suggestion! Is this something we could have a kick-off meeting for, so to get some structured approach and scope the work a bit? I would love to help, but it is hard for me to keep track of everything happening unless there is some sort of method to the madness 😅 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
There is an abundance of guidance for GitOps fundamentals, however a lack of consolidated guidance with architectural design, considerations, performance/human review limitations for running GitOps patterns at scale.
I'd like to collaborate with other around creating general guidance here:
Tangent related discussion topic here: #95
Some relevant resources I (or others have) found:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions