Prefer strings.Cut to strings.SplitN(..., 2)

[serprex]

No description provided.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: serprex / name: Philip Dubé (61ee1b9)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.53%. Comparing base (44879de) to head (61ee1b9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11758      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.53%   91.53%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         443      443              
  Lines       23766    23762       -4     
==========================================
- Hits        21754    21750       -4     
  Misses       1638     1638              
  Partials      374      374              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[serprex]

Should add Skip Changelog to Labels

[dmathieu]

I'm not sure this doesn't need a changelog entry.
While readability improvements definitely don't, switching from strings.Cut to strings.SplitN also reduces the number of allocations. So it's a small improvement in memory use.