-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DiskPool stuck Creating #1823
Comments
Hi @Mefinst, could you please try the latest version of openebs (4.3.0)? |
How could I obtain 4.3.0? |
Sorry, it's actually The |
Those logs from version |
Could you please share a support bundle for the clean install please? |
Hey, this is still mayastor v2.7.1, are you sure you're on openebs 4.2? |
Yep. That was 4.1.1. Here is new one from 4.2.0.
|
hmm indeed something is quite wrong. |
Deleting io-engine is not helpful. Though I collected support info after I deleted io-engine. |
Could you please scale down agent-core deployment. |
|
Describe the bug
DiskPool resources hang in Creating state due to IO-Engine unable to send Ok response after pool is in fact created.
IO-engine pod logs
From those I make a conclusion that IO-engine successfully creates or destroys a pool when requested to do so.
create_pool
method times out.As method times out, IO-engine fails to send success response.
Operator sends commands one after another to destroy and import pool, so it destroys previously created pool, then tries to import it, then tries to create new one, but hits timeout again.
I believe DiskPool operator should not send DestroyPoolRequest commands during creation process.
DiskPoll operator logs
Not so informative. Those contain the same messages which posted to
kubectl descrie diskpool
.To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
DiskPool created.
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
** OS info (please complete the following information):**
I use Openebs chart of versions 4.1.1, 4.1.2, 4.2.0 with default values.
I can not disclose infrastructure details due to NDA.
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: