feat: Images sizes and src link, blockquote styles (master)

[vladislavkeblysh]

• Fixed images size
• Fixed images source link
• Fixed blockquote styles

Related Pull Requests

• master - feat: Images sizes and src link, blockquote styles (master) #333
• quince.master - feat: Images sizes and src link, blockquote styles (quince.master) #334
• redwood.master - feat: Images sizes and src link, blockquote styles (redwood.master) #335

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @vladislavkeblysh!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/openedx-unmaintained. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

[ihor-romaniuk]

[nit] Let's use the paragon color $gray-200 instead of hardcoded color #ccc

[vladislavkeblysh]

Fixed

[mphilbrick211]

@vladislavkeblysh @ihor-romaniuk - just checking in on this!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (f433d33) to head (6b301ef).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #333   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          111       111           
  Lines         1082      1086    +4     
  Branches       159       159           
=========================================
+ Hits          1082      1086    +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ihor-romaniuk]

@mphilbrick211 I believe everything is ready for the final review and merging of this pull request into the quince branch. Could we proceed with that?

[mphilbrick211]

Hi @ihor-romaniuk. This repo is currently in the process of getting a new maintainer.

@arbrandes @brian-smith-tcril - is one of you able to take a look?

[brian-smith-tcril]

One thing that feels like it's missing is what input data led to the screenshots in the initial post. @vladislavkeblysh - it would be wonderful if you could update the initial post to include that.

Overall the code changes look good to me, I'd just like to play around with it in a sandbox to try to hit some edge cases before approving/merging. I've added the create-sandbox label to this issue so we can do some live verification.

[open-craft-grove]

Sandbox deployment failed 💥
Please check the settings and requirements.
Retry deployment by pushing a new commit or updating the requirements/settings in the pull request's description.
📜 Failure Logs
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements

[open-craft-grove]

Sandbox deployment failed 💥
Please check the settings and requirements.
Retry deployment by pushing a new commit or updating the requirements/settings in the pull request's description.
📜 Failure Logs
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements

[open-craft-grove]

Sandbox deployment failed 💥
Please check the settings and requirements.
Retry deployment by pushing a new commit or updating the requirements/settings in the pull request's description.
📜 Failure Logs
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements

[open-craft-grove]

Sandbox deployment failed 💥
Please check the settings and requirements.
Retry deployment by pushing a new commit or updating the requirements/settings in the pull request's description.
📜 Failure Logs
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements

[open-craft-grove]

Sandbox deployment successful 🚀
🎓 LMS
📝 Studio
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements

[open-craft-grove]

Sandbox deployment successful 🚀
🎓 LMS
📝 Studio
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements