-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Django 4.2 upgrade for Quince.1 Release #315
Comments
We have upgraded Django on our production instance of course-discovery and here is the backport PR for Quince for course-discovery. |
PR to upgrade Django 4.2 in the edx-platform in the Quince release is ready: |
Hi folks. @cmltaWt0: why can we merge the edx-platform upgrade to quince but not master? |
We have PR (openedx/edx-platform#33211) ready for merging on master, but we are still waiting for MySQL 8.0 upgrade to land on the production instance and also waiting for our sessions to be hashed with the new hashing algorithm. So we wanted to give it first to the Quince release. Hashing Algorithm Change: edx/edx-arch-experiments#453 More details on Slack: https://openedx.slack.com/archives/C049JQZFR5E/p1697203704251089 |
@mariajgrimaldi We have Django 3.2 EOL on 01 Apr 2024 - before Redwood so we have to land it in Quince in any case. |
I agree with @cmltaWt0. I'd prefer to wait for it to land in master, but I'm worried about the release timeline. We need to have a bit of time to test it out. @iamsobanjaved, do we have an estimate for merging the masters' PR? I'm also thinking we could benefit from the update early on in the testing process. |
We don't yet have any timeline for MySQL 8.0 upgrade on prod and hence blocked on it, there is an active effort on upgradation but facing certain issues. Also, we might have to wait for at least two weeks for old sessions to be replaced with new sessions. We have added all support commits on edx-platform master before branch cut and now only this last PR is remaining. My rationale for merging it into the release branch as soon as possible is that Open edX conducts rigorous testing on this branch. This way, if there are any errors, they can be detected during testing, and we can promptly provide fixes for them. But it is up to you guys to decide what fits for you. |
As I said, I usually agree with waiting for the master merge. But we should test this as soon as possible to identify any issues. @cmltaWt0 what do you think? |
Regarding the current state I can agree with the reasoning to merge it to the release branch so we can catch any weird behaviour. |
Great! Thank you both |
Just tested it.
|
It seems the process may be more complicated :)
So we have to update |
Pff. Thanks for testing that out! Should we open an issue in the tutor repository for the migration? So everyone is in sync. |
Yeap. Definitely. |
I've manage to build and run the Django 4.2 for lms/cms and mfe container. |
You can replace with Django50 and 51 warnings.
Yes we need this change, also mentioned in the Quince release notes here: https://openedx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/COMM/pages/3726802953/Pending+Release+Quince#Operational-%E2%9A%99%EF%B8%8F |
@iamsobanjaved: did you folks consider this change when upgrading to Django 4.x? #325 (comment) |
Yes we were aware of this change but we already had our host in |
@iamsobanjaved: so you folks no only add the MFE domains but all subdomains, right? |
List of services and corresponding PRs
Upgrade plan
https://openedx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/AC/pages/3767926815/Django+4.2+Upgrade+Plan
Tutor related updates
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: