Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate from xblock-utils package to xblock.utils #417

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 6, 2023

Conversation

farhan
Copy link
Contributor

@farhan farhan commented Oct 20, 2023

ticket: #414

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 7 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (c5d9a5f) 97.95% compared to head (402a2a8) 97.84%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #417      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.95%   97.84%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          77       77              
  Lines        6686     6696      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         6549     6552       +3     
- Misses        137      144       +7     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.84% <53.33%> (-0.11%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
lti_consumer/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lti_consumer/lti_1p1/contrib/django.py 80.00% <50.00%> (-6.37%) ⬇️
lti_consumer/outcomes.py 97.75% <50.00%> (-2.25%) ⬇️
lti_consumer/lti_xblock.py 96.08% <50.00%> (-0.57%) ⬇️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@farhan farhan force-pushed the farhan/remove-xblockutils branch 2 times, most recently from a9db94b to d9948d8 Compare October 30, 2023 13:43
@feanil feanil merged commit 4b13d3e into openedx:master Nov 6, 2023
5 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants