Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Improve apply_reference_operation Compatibility with eGon Project Data #446

Open
4 tasks
khelfen opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #447
Open
4 tasks

[FEATURE] Improve apply_reference_operation Compatibility with eGon Project Data #446

khelfen opened this issue Feb 5, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #447
Assignees

Comments

@khelfen
Copy link
Collaborator

khelfen commented Feb 5, 2025

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

The apply_reference_operation function does not work out of the box with home battery data from the eGon project. Additionally, there is no dedicated module within the EDisGo class to call this function directly. This makes it difficult to integrate the function seamlessly within workflows using eGon data.

Describe the solution you'd like

  • Modify apply_reference_operation to support eGon project data without requiring extensive preprocessing or adjustments.
    • Set default values for battery efficiency if none are given
    • Introduced more concise error messages when e.g. generators were not loaded before running the `apply_reference_operation' or time series for generators and loads were not set
  • Introduce a dedicated module or method within the edisgo class to allow direct calls to apply_reference_operation.

Describe alternatives you've considered

  • Manually preprocessing the eGon data before using apply_reference_operation, but this adds complexity and reduces usability.
@khelfen khelfen linked a pull request Feb 5, 2025 that will close this issue
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants