You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As it is calculated right now, the population density of the tested MVGrids is below 500 people/km². As @nesnoj pointed out in here a different approach should be taken if that is the case.
EDIT: You may try it this way and if you realise that most of the MVGD show a pop. density of <500 we should test the other version (cum. area sum of all load areas) - you may create an issue to make sure we won't forget about it?
I don't understand why population density for MVGrids should be calculated differently? Area and population of the grids I looked at seem plausible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't understand why population density for MVGrids should be calculated differently?
What I've written is: If most of them..
I just wanted to avoid params getting lost somewhere in the code without having them checked a litte bit more...
Thanks for creating this issue!
I checked the DENA VNS again: On p63 they calculate pop. density using the municipality area, so you did it the right way. And since ~29 % show an EWD > 500 is does not seem to be too unrealistic.
BTW, you may obtain a pop. density distribution using:
WITH ranges AS (
SELECT LPAD((ten*100)::text, 4, '0')||'..'||LPAD((ten*100+99)::text, 4, '0')||' EW/km2' AS range,
ten*100 AS r_min, ten*100+99 AS r_max
FROM generate_series(0,20) AS t(ten))
SELECT r.range, count(s.*)
FROM ranges r
LEFT JOIN grid.ego_dp_mv_griddistrict s ON population_density*100 BETWEEN r.r_min AND r.r_max
WHERE population_density*100 < 10000
GROUP BY r.range
ORDER BY r.range;
As it is calculated right now, the population density of the tested MVGrids is below 500 people/km². As @nesnoj pointed out in here a different approach should be taken if that is the case.
I don't understand why population density for MVGrids should be calculated differently? Area and population of the grids I looked at seem plausible.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: