-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Same EAN different weight how to handle ? #913
Comments
I'm pretty sure barcodes that start with a 2 are "shop-weight specific". |
And it's gonna be a double whammy since the parent category is not yet included in #262. Should the script https://github.com/openfoodfacts/open-prices-frontend/blob/master/data/categories/filter_categories.py be in the wiki ? Based on based on what you said about EAN starting with a 2 should all of them ( for example https://fr.openfoodfacts.org/categorie/foie-de-poulet ) be reprocessed ? Would you still favor tweaking the script/filter/list on a one by one basis, essentially waiting for someone to request a product which doesn't show up when typed in the category box ? or should we add more in one go and run the risk of having too long a list ? |
I'll let @aleene answer that one ^^ |
You can always add a product with a barcode. Note that these are internal barcodes which can represent different products for different shops. Barcodes with enocoded weights are not yet supported. I assume that there is an issue already open for this. |
see also https://prices.openfoodfacts.org/products/2644188023291 identical EAN weight varying wildly |
Description
Pretty sure it came up already, 2860050040672 , there's a slight variation in weight ( 1337g in the OFF product's picture, 1242g in the picture I took today ) which would skew the weight per kilo, it feels like it should be handled like a "category" product by inputting the price per quantity when entered in OP but they use the same EAN...it's great for price tracking but I think also ripe for data quality issues, especially with casual users.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: