Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

_TypeError: Null check operator used on a null value - "background_task_details.dart", line 114, #4703

Closed
sentry-io bot opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@sentry-io
Copy link

sentry-io bot commented Oct 6, 2023

Sentry Issue: SMOOTHIE-2MB

_TypeError: Null check operator used on a null value
  File "background_task_details.dart", line 114, in BackgroundTaskDetails._getNewTask
  File "background_task_details.dart", line 81, in BackgroundTaskDetails.addTask
  File "simple_input_page.dart", line 192, in _SimpleInputPageState._mayExitPage
  File "simple_input_page.dart", line 114, in _SimpleInputPageState.build.<fn>
...
(1 additional frame(s) were not displayed)
@harhitosw
Copy link

harhitosw commented Oct 7, 2023

@teolemon can I take up this issue ?

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Oct 7, 2023

Sure, any intuition as to what the fix may be ?

@harhitosw
Copy link

@teolemon I am looking at that I will update once I find what is wrong :)

@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor

@harhitosw I wouldn't waste too much energy on this one.
As explained in #4702 and SMOOTHIE-2PQ, this happened in an older version of Smoothie (4.9.1).
That is, before d804222 and its fix of #4575.

Therefore, for the fix we need the user to get a fresher version of Smoothie.

@teolemon In that case I don't know how we should to flag this issue and #4702. Just close them?

@g123k
Copy link
Collaborator

g123k commented Oct 16, 2023

We can simply mute this error in Sentry and that would do the trick I think

@M123-dev
Copy link
Member

I marked it as resolved for 4.11, closing hoping it wont pop up again

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants