Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
92 lines (67 loc) · 3.23 KB

File metadata and controls

92 lines (67 loc) · 3.23 KB

3rd place solution

You can find the code on github here.

Multiome

Preprocess

feature

Basically, pre-processing contributed greatly to the accuracy, but the following features also contributed somewhat to the accuracy.

  • binary feature transformed 0/1 binary and reduced 16 dimensions(svd) as features
  • w2v vector feature For each cell, the top100 with the highest expression levels were lined up and vectorized by gensim to get feature vector(16dims) for each gene. https://radimrehurek.com/gensim/models/word2vec.html Ex. CellA: geneB → geneE → geneF → … CellB: geneA → geneC → geneM → … top100 genes vector average in each cell used as features.
  • leiden cluster mean feature I made Clusters using muon’s leiden clustering(23 cluster). https://muon.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api/generated/muon.tl.leiden.html#muon.tl.leiden After taking the average of the features for each cluster(23 cluster × 228942 feat), they were reduced to 16 dimensions by svd and used as features(23 cluster × 16feat). After that, join on clusters.
  • connectivy matrix feature Since muon’s leiden clustering generates an adjacency matrix between cells as a byproduct, I also use it 16-dimensional with svd as a feature.

Model

  • mlp Simple 4-layer mlp; no major differences from mlp in public notebooks target has been reduced to 128 dimensions with svd. use rmse loss
  • catboost
    • target has been reduced to 128 dimensions with svd.

Ensemble

I made a model of nearly 20 mlp and 3 catboosts with various feature combinations. and cv-based weighted averaging.

CITEseq

Preprocess

The same process as in the organizer was applied.

use sc.pp.normalize_per_cell and sc.pp.log1p (excluding the gene that are significantly related to the target protein)

Feature

I’ve made a lot of features, and here are some of them that have worked to some degree.

  • leiden cluster feature I made Clusters using muon’s leiden clustering. Average of features per cluster and reduce dimensions with svd. (excluding Important genes. It were not used svd, and use raw count’s average for each cluster was used as features as is.)
  • w2v vector feature Same as multiome.

Model

  • mlp
    • Simple 4-layer mlp; no major differences from mlp in public notebooks
    • Using correlation_loss. No different from public notebook.
  • catboost

Ensemble

I made a model of nearly 20 mlp and 2 catboosts with various feature combinations. and cv-based weighted averaging.

Validation

It goes without saying that one of the key elements of this competition is validation. I tried binary classification to classify test data used in PB and others. (At this point, the classification accuracy was so high. So I think it is dangerous to trust LB.) The 10% of the training data that is close to the PB, is used as validation data. This method seemed to work well, the submit with my highest cv was highest pb score.