Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build java bindings with native M1 instruction set #3938

Open
aymanhab opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 10 comments
Open

Build java bindings with native M1 instruction set #3938

aymanhab opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 10 comments

Comments

@aymanhab
Copy link
Member

aymanhab commented Oct 9, 2024

Since GUI can't compile a full stack native M1 libraries as of 10/24, we will publish/support API builds with native M1 libraries.

@aymanhab
Copy link
Member Author

@aymanhab
Copy link
Member Author

The above link has API build with java bindings but without Moco. I'll post one with Moco soon.

@aymanhab
Copy link
Member Author

@aymanhab
Copy link
Member Author

@mattpetrucci Here's the zip files for api builds on M1

@nickbianco
Copy link
Member

@aymanhab is this in response to #3917?

@aymanhab
Copy link
Member Author

Not really, the issue in 3917 happened even using Rosetta and in python. This responds to bj wanting to run api natively in matlab on Apple silicon

@nickbianco
Copy link
Member

Gotcha. Is this something we should PR into core?

@aymanhab
Copy link
Member Author

aymanhab commented Oct 15, 2024 via email

@mattpetrucci
Copy link

mattpetrucci commented Oct 17, 2024

@aymanhab @nickbianco Tried running configureOpenSim.m. Selected the main folder and it breaks showing the message "The Folder you selected is not an OpenSim installation." Did the same when I select the bin folder.

It looks like the problem is in line 95 of the code. It wants the path to get the openSimFolder, which needs the appDir which is this path: /Users/Matt/Documents/OpenSimArtifacts/opensim-core-source-install/opensim-core-source-install.app. This path doesn't exist.

@aymanhab
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks Matt, indeed this is expected as the script never used or tested an api install, I'll update and let you know next week. Thanks again

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants