Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[18.0-fr1] Add the hypervisors to the inventory #2645

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 18.0-fr1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #2620

/assign eurijon

For use cases like ShiftOnStack the deployment may need to tweak the
hypervisor.
We did not have a way to tell the deployment how to reach the hypervisor
so this commit exposes the hypervisor Ansible instance to each host
and creates a hypervisors group in the generated inventory.
Copy link

Thanks for the PR! ❤️
I'm marking it as a draft, once your happy with it merging and the PR is passing CI, click the "Ready for review" button below.

@pablintino
Copy link
Collaborator

/approve
/lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 14, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pablintino

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/9e799f4e391b4217b3283bb9a7b7271c

openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider FAILURE in 15m 08s
⚠️ podified-multinode-edpm-deployment-crc SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider
⚠️ cifmw-crc-podified-edpm-baremetal SKIPPED Skipped due to failed job openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider
✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
✔️ cifmw-pod-ansible-test SUCCESS in 7m 40s
✔️ cifmw-pod-pre-commit SUCCESS in 8m 03s
✔️ build-push-container-cifmw-client SUCCESS in 36m 47s
✔️ cifmw-molecule-libvirt_manager SUCCESS in 44m 21s
✔️ cifmw-molecule-reproducer SUCCESS in 17m 17s

@pablintino
Copy link
Collaborator

recheck

Copy link
Contributor

@ciecierski ciecierski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please check comment: #2620 (comment)

@pablintino
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @ciecierski, it's ok for you if we merge this now that the patch to avoid the issue in DS is merged?

Copy link
Contributor

@ciecierski ciecierski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good to merge. Problem was in internal ansible playbook logic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants