-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
16ff283b-3431-4ea7-8251-ef5783fdc98c.html
121 lines (121 loc) · 4.21 KB
/
16ff283b-3431-4ea7-8251-ef5783fdc98c.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
<h4>Zero as an Exponent</h4>
<p>Why is \(2^0=1\) and \(5^0=1\), but \(2^3\) is not the same as \(5^3\)?</p>
<p>Answering this question will help us understand the <span class="os-raise-ib-tooltip" data-schema-version="1.0" data-store="glossary-tooltip">zero exponent rule</span>.</p>
<p>Exponents in general represent repeated multiplication, much like multiplication represents repeated addition. Let’s use that understanding to evaluate \(2^3\) and \(5^3\):</p>
<p> \(2^3=2\cdot2\cdot2=4\cdot2=8\)</p>
<p> \(5^3=5\cdot5\cdot5=25\cdot5=125\)</p>
<p>8 and 125 are obviously very different, but the method to get to each answer was the same. If we rewrite it as a table, we can work backward to understand how \(2^0\) and \(5^0\) are both 1.</p>
<p>Using \(y=2^x\) and filling in the parts we have found results in Table 1:</p>
<br>
<table class="os-raise-horizontaltable">
<thead>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row"> \(x\) </th>
<td> 0 </td>
<td> 1 </td>
<td> 2 </td>
<td> 3 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row"> \(y\) </th>
<td> </td>
<td> 2 </td>
<td> 4 </td>
<td> 8 </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<p>Repeating that process for \(y=5^x\) results in Table 2:</p>
<br>
<table class="os-raise-horizontaltable">
<thead>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row"> \(x\) </th>
<td> 0 </td>
<td> 1 </td>
<td> 2 </td>
<td> 3 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row"> \(y\) </th>
<td> </td>
<td> 5 </td>
<td> 25 </td>
<td> 125 </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<p>Since exponents represent repeated multiplication in both tables, additional terms are found by multiplying again by the base. What if we worked backward? If you multiply to move to the right in the table, you can divide by the common ratio to work backward. Start with the 8, and work backward to fill in the table:</p>
<br>
<table class="os-raise-horizontaltable">
<thead>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row"> \(x\) </th>
<td> 0 </td>
<td> 1 </td>
<td> 2 </td>
<td> 3 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row"> \(y\) </th>
<td> \(2\div2=1\) </td>
<td> \(4\div2=2\) </td>
<td> \(8\div2=4\) </td>
<td> 8 </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<p>Repeat the process for Table 2:</p>
<br>
<table class="os-raise-horizontaltable">
<thead>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th scope="row"> \(x\) </th>
<td> 0 </td>
<td> 1 </td>
<td> 2 </td>
<td> 3 </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th scope="row"> \(y\) </th>
<td> \(5\div5=1\) </td>
<td> \(25\div5=5\) </td>
<td> \(125\div5=25\) </td>
<td> 125 </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<p>After you have worked backward in each table, you will see that \(2^0\) and \(5^0\) both equal 1. When 1 is the exponent, your answer is the same as the common ratio, so when you divide by the common ratio, you end up with 1 as your answer every time. This is an important rule that can save a lot of time.</p>
<h4>Try It: Zero as an Exponent</h4>
<div class="os-raise-ib-cta" data-button-text="Solution" data-fire-event="Reveal1" data-schema-version="1.0">
<div class="os-raise-ib-cta-content">
<p>Find the value of each of the following:</p>
</div>
<div class="os-raise-ib-cta-prompt">
<ol class="os-raise-noindent">
<li> \(3^0\) </li>
<li> \(1,246^0\)</li>
<li>\(
\left(2\cdot3\cdot7\right)^0\)</li>
</ol>
<p>Write down your answer. Then select the<strong> solution</strong> button to compare your work.<br></p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="os-raise-ib-content" data-schema-version="1.0" data-wait-for-event="Reveal1">
<p>Compare your answer:</p>
<p>Here is how to use the zero exponent rule to determine the value of each:</p>
<p>The answer to each expression is 1. If you want to work backward, it doesn’t matter how large the original number is. \(3\div3=1\) and \(1246\div1246=1\), and both expressions only contain a base and zero as exponent, so the answer is 1. For c, there is an expression inside the parentheses that you can evaluate first, but since it is still the base raised to a zero exponent, the answer will still be one.</p>
</div>
<br>