Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unmarked Crossing nodes added by iD are missing tags #1275

Open
une-abeille-osm opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by openstreetmap/iD#9586
Open

Unmarked Crossing nodes added by iD are missing tags #1275

une-abeille-osm opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by openstreetmap/iD#9586
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@une-abeille-osm
Copy link

Describe the bug
When drawing in sidewalks as separate ways, it's necessary to draw crossings as ways as well. Unmarked Crossing ways (as named in iD; crossing=unmarked, footway=crossing) that cross a street prompt the user to connect the ways with a node, and that resulting node has incomplete tags. This results in the user having to manually correct each error before uploading changes.

Marked Crossings and Crossings With Pedestrian Signals do not have this issue.

To Reproduce

  1. Draw an Unmarked Crossing way across another way
  2. Click "Connect using a Crossing" as suggested by iD
  3. View Issues console

Expected behavior
The added node should have all required tags

Screenshots
image
image
image

@une-abeille-osm une-abeille-osm added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 2, 2024
@tordans
Copy link
Collaborator

tordans commented Jul 2, 2024

It sounds like this will be solved by openstreetmap/iD#9586 (review)

You might also want to check out #1201 (comment) where I refactor the crossing presets.

Lets keep this open until openstreetmap/iD#9586 is merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants