Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(grid): [grid] validate successful add return value in promise sense #2851

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2025

Conversation

gimmyhehe
Copy link
Member

@gimmyhehe gimmyhehe commented Jan 26, 2025

PR

在promise使用场景下,新增校验成功返回值

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved validation method in grid component to provide clearer error handling and return values.
    • Enhanced beginValidate method to explicitly return validation status.
  • Documentation

    • Updated method descriptions to clarify validation process and return behavior.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 26, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the grid component's validation methods in both the demo example and the core Vue implementation. The changes primarily focus on clarifying the validate method's behavior, updating its description, and ensuring proper return values during the validation process. The modifications aim to improve the method's documentation and promise resolution behavior.

Changes

File Change Summary
examples/sites/demos/apis/grid.js Updated validate method description to clarify return values and error handling
packages/vue/src/grid/src/validator/src/methods.ts Modified beginValidate method to explicitly return opt.status in the onFulfilled function

Suggested labels

bug

Suggested reviewers

  • zzcr

Poem

🐰 Validation's dance, a grid's delight,
Promises resolved with technical might,
Methods refined, errors now clear,
Code flows smoother, bringing cheer!
A rabbit's code review takes flight 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 65c404b and 1967dec.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • examples/sites/demos/apis/grid.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/vue/src/grid/src/validator/src/methods.ts (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: PR E2E Test (pnpm test:e2e3)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/vue/src/grid/src/validator/src/methods.ts (1)

179-179: LGTM! Explicit return value improves clarity.

The explicit return of opt.status in the onFulfilled function clarifies the promise resolution behavior, making it consistent with the documented behavior in the API.

examples/sites/demos/apis/grid.js (1)

2493-2495: LGTM! Documentation update clarifies return values.

The updated description accurately specifies the return behavior:

  • Success: returns true (new in 3.22.0)
  • Failure: returns error information object
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 26, 2025
Copy link

Walkthrough

This PR enhances the grid validation function by adding a return value for successful validation in promise scenarios. It updates the description to reflect that a successful validation returns true, and a failed validation returns an error object. Additionally, it modifies the validate method to return the validation status.

Changes

File Summary
examples/sites/demos/apis/grid.js Updated the description of the grid validation function to include return values for promise scenarios.
packages/vue/src/grid/src/validator/src/methods.ts Modified the validate method to return the validation status.

@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ export default {
}

cb && cb(opt.status)
return opt.status

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure that the return value of opt.status is correctly handled by the calling function, as this change introduces a return statement that may affect the function's behavior.

@zzcr zzcr merged commit 192bce0 into dev Feb 5, 2025
13 of 22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants