You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many programs in testdata declare tensor literals with a syntax of the form dense<"0x29C0C7404">, which is not mentioned in the specification. Example.
but I am inferring this from testdata programs and I would like to know if this is indeed general enough or if I am missing other patterns that are not present in testdata.
While I mention the TensorConstant grammar, note that the current grammar
allows to derive a term like dense <3.2> in two ways: TensorLiteral -> ElementLiteral -> FloatLiteral
or TensorLiteral -> DenseLiteral -> DenseElements -> ElementLiteral -> FloatLiteral
What happened?
Many programs in
testdata
declare tensor literals with a syntax of the formdense<"0x29C0C7404">
, which is not mentioned in the specification. Example.The actual syntax seems to be something like:
but I am inferring this from
testdata
programs and I would like to know if this is indeed general enough or if I am missing other patterns that are not present intestdata
.While I mention the
TensorConstant
grammar, note that the current grammarallows to derive a term like
dense <3.2>
in two ways:TensorLiteral
->ElementLiteral
->FloatLiteral
or
TensorLiteral
->DenseLiteral
->DenseElements
->ElementLiteral
->FloatLiteral
and could be simplified to:
Steps to reproduce your issue
No response
Version information
73b0862
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: