Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for javax.cache:cache-api:1.1.1 #136

Closed
linghengqian opened this issue Dec 2, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #176
Closed

Add support for javax.cache:cache-api:1.1.1 #136

linghengqian opened this issue Dec 2, 2022 · 2 comments · Fixed by #176
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@linghengqian
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

  • Currently, com.hazelcast:hazelcast:5.2.1 and org.ehcache:ehcache:3.10.8-jakarta are both in the nativeTest process, and a part of javax.cache:cache-api:1.1.1 GraalVM reachability metadata is manually maintained dependent. It should be expected behavior to supplement this API facade library with more specific GraalVM reachability metadata.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

  • Considering that javax.cache:cache-api:1.1.1 itself is just a set of interfaces, writing tests for it seems like a hassle.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@linghengqian linghengqian added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 2, 2022
@linghengqian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@linghengqian
Copy link
Contributor Author

linghengqian commented Jan 14, 2023

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant