You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@wetdog suggested using Sox to generate spectrograms.
What are (dis)advantages over obspy/scipy? If there is no processing we could just drop Python and use bash+Sox I guess (or even some light processing, see link above).
float32 spectrogram:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yup, that's true, -r will create a raw spectrogram. But @valentina-s actually requested to add dB scale to the spectrograms generated using Python (#6) so we'll probably keep them. And as @yosoyjay correctly noted if we need raw spectrograms for later processing it's really easy to cut them out from the image.
But for now, we are sticking with Python because it is easier to use different tools operating on the raw data, rather than using Sox + something else on images.
@wetdog suggested using Sox to generate spectrograms.
What are (dis)advantages over
obspy
/scipy
? If there is no processing we could just drop Python and use bash+Sox I guess (or even some light processing, see link above).float32 spectrogram:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: