Which option to go with? tKey (self host SDK) or custom verifier? #1162
auracheeze
announced in
Help
Replies: 1 comment
-
Hey @auracheeze If your objective is to create the same wallet/key for a user regardless of login provider, provided they both use the same email, or there must be a unique identifier between the JWT returned from each provider. Let's say Then, you can aggregate the verifiers and get the same key back. The question here is whether to choose aggregate verifiers or self-host. So, the aggregate verifier is a feature and can be available to both the Self-Host SDK and our Plug n Play SDKs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
My objective is to be able to create the same wallet/key for a user regardless of whether the user signs in with her Google account or Twitter account.
I read that an aggregate verifier is needed (https://web3auth.io/docs/custom-authentication/verifiers#aggregate-verifiers).
At the same time, the self-host option (https://web3auth.io/docs/sdk/self-host/) seemingly can achieve this objective as well.
Are these two options both viable to achieve this goal?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions