Propsal PP public inputs #118
Replies: 4 comments 1 reply
-
I think that this is fine - there shouldn't be any reason for L1 to access LBR or |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
great !! From the SC perspective we will just only store the
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
follow up: SP1 already joins all public inputs into a single one by default using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
These are two proposals to slightly change the PP public inputs in order to save gas consumption when the proof is settled on L1.
Join all inputs into a single one
The trade-off is:
cycles
in the proof since akeccak256
hash is neededJoin LBR & nullifierRoot into a single one
cycles
in the proof since akeccak256
is neededcc: @HarryTmetic @hadjiszs @pgebheim
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions