Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
@mbakker7 Hm, I have not noticed that, but I think we have not done a careful comparison. Like, I think we were just happy that numpy2 worked! Our tests pass, but these tend not to be too fussy about the precision of the results. I am not sure what from numpy would be numerically very different. OTOH, I would not be shocked at changes with scipy versions. Can you post a simple example that shows a difference? Thanks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@mbakker7 I can definitely believe scipy versions could have an impact, especially for some solvers, though I do not know of anything in particular for any recent scipy versions (like, over several years). I usually just use "latest available", but if you're looking for differences between versions, I would believe changes in lmfit version, then scipy version, then numpy. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I only upgraded numpy (from 1.x to 2.x) and now I get different results for lmfit.
Just doing a minimization with leastsq.
Has anybody seen that before?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions