Replies: 1 comment
-
Hello @otternq - thank you for the detail of these issues and the suggested ideas. The problem is that we do not accept functional changes to Ory Keto as is. Maybe you have seen the pinned issue #267 or the PR #266. We're actually quite close to a release, pending documentation, and are running the new Ory Keto in our staging environment. I hope this doesn't frustrate you too much - we'll be able to provide more details on the refactoring soon. We have not yet defined migrations paths but are planning on doing that with community support. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
I'm evaluating Ory systems and I'm interested in supplying Keto policy information to an Oathkeeper upstream application (maybe as part of a id_token mutation?). The Keto policy would allow the upstream application to run a slightly different query for different subjects.
For an example request
subject 1 who has access through a
primary-user
policy would receivewhile subject 2 accessing the same endpoint through a
limited-user
policy would receiveIt seems possible for Keto's rego queries to bind the policies allowing access to its
ResultSet
. With that information in Keto's response perhaps Oathkeeper could make it available through theAuthenticationSession
.Would this functionality be helpful? Is this an anti-pattern?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions