You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The FFT on the squared signal provides a rough estimate of the frequency offset while phase slope should provide a fine frequency offset estimate.
1/ the squared signal exhibits many additional spectral features beyond the expected 0-\pi at 2.5 Mchips/s. Where do these additional spectral components come from?
2/ phase unwrapping does not continuously connect rough frequency estimates but still exhibit some "jumps" from one coarse estimate to the next.
3/ why is the phase of the correlation not rotating at the rate of the fine frequency offset?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The FFT on the squared signal provides a rough estimate of the frequency offset while phase slope should provide a fine frequency offset estimate.
1/ the squared signal exhibits many additional spectral features beyond the expected 0-\pi at 2.5 Mchips/s. Where do these additional spectral components come from?
2/ phase unwrapping does not continuously connect rough frequency estimates but still exhibit some "jumps" from one coarse estimate to the next.
3/ why is the phase of the correlation not rotating at the rate of the fine frequency offset?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: