Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

interact hook should take collections/topics/qrels flags #114

Open
cmacdonald opened this issue Jul 1, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

interact hook should take collections/topics/qrels flags #114

cmacdonald opened this issue Jul 1, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@cmacdonald
Copy link
Member

If I want to repeat a run in my interact hook, its a bit difficult as the topics/qrels arent mounted. Similarly with which collections are in use.

@arjenpdevries
Copy link
Member

I agree it would be good if interact mode would mount topics and qrels directories.

Maybe we need an environment variable for the information about collections that were created? (E.g., store the JSON version of the parameters?)

@chriskamphuis
Copy link
Member

It could be useful if they are already mounted during the prepare step, then they are available for both search and interact. Saving the image after the search step would also solve this issue, but then the interact can only use the topics/qrels after search.

@cmacdonald
Copy link
Member Author

@chriskamphuis I think the idea of the images by @r-clancy is that they can handle multiple collections in the same container image. hence why they are not mounted once in prepare?

@chriskamphuis
Copy link
Member

chriskamphuis commented Jul 1, 2019

@cmacdonald Sure, we also support indexing multiple collection in one container. But in a similar fashion it also could be possible to support multiple topic/qrel files right? But I agree that if it is necessary to specify the files multiple times it is less elegant than your solution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants