Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Readthedocs site says it was hacked #3312

Closed
genodeftest opened this issue Sep 22, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3313
Closed

Readthedocs site says it was hacked #3312

genodeftest opened this issue Sep 22, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3313

Comments

@genodeftest
Copy link

The readthedocs site https://ostree.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ says it was hacked. That site is referenced multiple times across the repos so I guess it should be the legit documentation website.

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

cgwalters commented Sep 23, 2024

Ouch. Thanks for the report. I don't remember now what the credentials setup was for that. A bit...lame...for this researcher to just take over sites permanently. In any case the GH pages setup should be more secure in the sense that it doesn't have distinct credentials to publish anything.

I submitted #3313 - the only place I found a reference was the Rust bindings.

genodeftest added a commit to genodeftest/ostree that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2024
Upstream's readthedocs website was hacked, we should use their new website.

For more details, see upstream issue ostreedev/ostree#3312
@genodeftest
Copy link
Author

Thanks! It might make sense to contact the readthedocs.io support to get the site back.

Some references still point to the readthedocs URL, for example the Fedora package's metadata (PR to change that). There might be more in other upstreams.

@ostreedev ostreedev deleted a comment from Khursipar Sep 24, 2024
@ostreedev ostreedev deleted a comment from Khursipar Sep 24, 2024
@ostreedev ostreedev deleted a comment from Khursipar Sep 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants