Possible improvements for user executors

[manzan46]

👋 Hope this is the right place for improvement ideas :)

We recently at @heetch try to find a tool to replace our current homemade testing tool and had a bit of test with Venom 🙌

The recent addition of User executors definitely makes it easier with reusability.

Few things that could help even more:

1️⃣ First would be able to pass to the command a flag to specify the lib folder directory, if nothing is specified we keep the current behavior of lib

This would allow more flexibility, in order to share user_executor if you have testsuits in different folders (e.g. microservices)

2️⃣ Second one is to make getFilePaths using filepath.Walk to get all yaml file in the directory and subdirectory

This would allow to not have all user executors in one folder.

3️⃣ When a user executor assertions failed, in the output, we just get a FAILURE message but not the assertion failure as we have for teststep, so we have to dig in the log.

---

Hope this makes sense, I got 1️⃣ and 2️⃣ working on my local build so happy to open PR if you think this would help, for 3️⃣ I got something kind of working but it's more of a hack, and the display is not great 🙈

[fsamin]

Hello,
Thanks for you feedback.
Those suggestions sound good. Can you create 3 new issues to track them ?

[manzan46]

Thanks will do 🙏🏻

[yesnault]

1️⃣ 2️⃣ 3️⃣ now on master

[manzan46]

🔥 🥳 🙏🏻 :parrot-party: