Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UDN: codecleanup: Ensure we have better split of common things in BSNC versus each topologies specific requirements #4689

Open
tssurya opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
lifecycle/stale All issues (> 60 days) and PRs (>90 days) with no activity.

Comments

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Sep 2, 2024

What is this issue about?

see #4669 (comment)

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Sep 2, 2024

cc @maiqueb

@tssurya tssurya changed the title UDN: Ensure we have better split of common things in BSNC versus each topologies specific requirements UDN: codecleanup: Ensure we have better split of common things in BSNC versus each topologies specific requirements Sep 2, 2024
@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor Author

tssurya commented Sep 3, 2024

same goes for gatewayManager as well where we assume join switch exists in L2 needs a nice split cc @kyrtapz

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2024

This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale All issues (> 60 days) and PRs (>90 days) with no activity. label Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/stale All issues (> 60 days) and PRs (>90 days) with no activity.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant