Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

more flexible configuration #10

Open
1 of 4 tasks
odanoburu opened this issue Jul 25, 2019 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 4 tasks

more flexible configuration #10

odanoburu opened this issue Jul 25, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@odanoburu
Copy link
Collaborator

odanoburu commented Jul 25, 2019 •
edited
Loading

validation

  • allow user to specify configuration files or directory where to find them
  • improve relations.tsv to contain information about domain and counterdomain, and check those at validation phase

RDF generation

  • allow user to specify base IRI instead of hardcoding it
    • base IRI for each wordnet is specified in wn.tsv, but this information is not used. the base IRI for the predicates should be specified as a flag.

reading

  • probably better to improve configuration data types to decrease duplication (instead of several Map a b, use Map a (b, c, d, e))
odanoburu added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 19, 2019
@odanoburu
* let user pick baseIRI
e7d09a1 
related to #10
odanoburu added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2019
@odanoburu
* let user pick baseIRI
d61db9c 
related to #10
odanoburu added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 25, 2019
@odanoburu
* let user specify configuration directory explicitly
f1094a7 
- if not provided assume it's with the WN files
- if a file is provided as a configuration directory, (try to) use its
  directory as the configuration directory (but don't document this
  behavior)

related to #10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@odanoburu