meta rewriting rule

[vcvpaiva]

Jan, 8th, 2017 I said:
So to make progress with this I'd say that we first simply count necessary concepts and check how many are correct.

(note that Entity is not necessary and it should NOT be counted. if the SICK creators did what they said they would do, all the tenses are progressive, so there will be these non-necessary and miscounting Entity concepts all over the place.)

So for future I'd suggest rules that rewrite the dependencies to say:

1. (determiners such as a,the, this, ..) are not important for this level, keep the word, ditch the concept. rewriting rule 1: "a, the, some" and det ==> NA (not applicable) #67
2. aux verbs are not important, keep the word (and features), ditch the concept. rewriting rule 2: "is, are" and aux ==> NA #68
3. NP's that are adj+noun should make a single concept, eventually. rewriting rule 7: amod should relate adjectives and nouns #29
4. noun-noun compounds need to be put together, as do "particle verbs" that are creating wrong concepts, see below. rewriting rule 6: multiword compounds #47, rewriting rule 4: particle verbs #36
5. pronouns need concepts rewriting rule 9: mapping pronouns #61
6. negative expletives need to be rewritten
7. need more info in conjunctions rewriting rule 5: PROP&PROP as conj_VERB #35

all sentences can either be a PROP or PROP&PROP or NOT PROP only. can we check?
we did check in the sub-corpus 3-4-5. issue #57

[vcvpaiva]

Further rules:

1. except when negated (?? check this) Amodifier Noun ==> Noun, e.g
   black dog ==> dog
   tall man ==> man
2. there are basic entailments that need to be in the lexicon, e.g
   typing ==> writing
   slicing ==> cutting
   see Proposed implications (3-4 tokens only) #73