-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sled table rcgen has higher-than-expected numbers #5207
Comments
With a hat tip to @davepacheco for teaching me about
It looks like they continued to increase until about 40 seconds after they were created:
|
As @jgallagher and I discovered, the unexpected bumps in rcgen are due to the to the On the other hand, I found the implicit behavior here confusing, despite having reviewed RFD 192 (2+ years ago). I think the extension trait makes sense for getting this right, and not having to re-implement the wheel for every child collection. I don't actually believe we should change any of this after thinking about it for a while. I do wonder though if we are using |
One other thing about this, is that @sunshowers has talked about changing the |
@jgallagher pointed out that as long as |
I'm going to close this as |
While testing #5124, we noticed some surprisingly high
rcgen
counts.madrid
had just been wiped and gone through RSS about 90 minutes prior to running this query:When we added a new sled, its initial entry in the table also had a surprisingly high
rcgen
:When the reservoir size was updated (the whole point of #5124), we saw the new sled's rcgen get bumped by 1 as expected:
For comparison and to rule out #5124, we checked dogfood, and see very high rcgen counts there:
There might not (?) be an issue here? But @andrewjstone is going to investigate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: