-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Description of SCE_data not given #17
Comments
I have the same question too, @pankajkarman could you please help to clarify this. Thanks in advance |
Hi Vik-1, |
Thank you |
This package needs 3 datasets. One is reference dataset which is generally the observation mostly ground based. Second is model historical datasets which would have the same time stamp as the reference dataset. These 2 datasets are used for estimating the bias values which is instead to correct the third scenario dataset. I hope It's clear now. BTW I'll be updating the documentation in coming weeks. |
Thank you
Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2022, 23:58:45 GMT+8 hat Pankaj Kumar ***@***.***> Folgendes geschrieben:
This package needs 3 datasets. One is reference dataset which is generally the observation mostly ground based. Second is model historical datasets which would have the same time stamp as the reference dataset. These 2 datasets are used for estimating the bias values which is instead to correct the third scenario dataset.
I hope It's clear now. BTW I'll be updating the documentation in coming weeks.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
I am a bit confused. The third scenario dataset are the historical data that we use as the second input? Or future scenario (e.g. ssp126) datasets? |
So in essence, the model data and the sce data can both be the same? The model data is the one that has to be corrected in my particular case. |
That's correct. As per my understanding.
…On Mon, 15 Aug 2022, 19:37 Gohar Shoukat, ***@***.***> wrote:
So in essence, the model data and the sce data can both be the same? The
model data is the one that has to be corrected in my particular case.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#17 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ276AGFDT76GMOVOE5VAR3VZJFINANCNFSM5ZIPSFWA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I too had a similar confusion. My observation data - A, and my model output (to be corrected) is B. I don't have a third set of that which is supposed to be the model historical. So what should I do in such a situation. |
Use 3rd argument as the model data if you need to correct to the
observation.
…On Wed, 17 Aug 2022, 06:19 Anjali Thomas, ***@***.***> wrote:
I too had a similar confusion. My observation data - A, and my model
output (to be corrected) is B. I don't have a third set of that which is
supposed to be the model historical. So what should I do in such a
situation.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#17 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ276ACPWGUI7NQUZHBROCLVZQZIZANCNFSM5ZIPSFWA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Thank you for the prompt reply. |
Hi @ALL, something is wrong with the arguement, the correct thing is to correct the model output using observation and not the other way round.
Therefore, it should be made very clear. The confusion for here is;
If you have model output: historical and future projection datasets (hist. and SSPs). According to the bias correction eqns (defending on a particular method). You use the observation to correct the historical and thereafter using the same for future projection eg SSP245.
Having said that, a user of this code is expecting 1. bias corrected historical data and future bias corrected data as outputs.
Given the above, what is the 3 variable? is it future projection data? hope we can get two ouputs? if that is the case.
regards
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 8:52 AM, ***@***.***> wrote:
Use 3rd argument as the model data if you need to correct to the
observation.
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022, 06:19 Anjali Thomas, ***@***.***> wrote:
I too had a similar confusion. My observation data - A, and my model
output (to be corrected) is B. I don't have a third set of that which is
supposed to be the model historical. So what should I do in such a
situation.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#17 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ276ACPWGUI7NQUZHBROCLVZQZIZANCNFSM5ZIPSFWA>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
This package is quite different in its results compared to the R package. It would be interesting to see the difference between the two. |
From the code I could understand that obs and mod data are modeled and observed datasets. What is SCE_data? please provide the documentation for the same
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: