Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Training a new model on panel data beyond Sig3 #71

Open
jpuntomarcos opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Training a new model on panel data beyond Sig3 #71

jpuntomarcos opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@jpuntomarcos
Copy link

Hi!

We are interested in training a new model for a different gene panel; the guide helped a lot.

We want to detect other signatures beyond Sig3. I have read that we can use colname_truth_tag parameter in tune_new_gbm(). Default value is is_sig3, Which are the alternative values? is_sig4, is_sig5, etc?

Also, following the test_tune_example.R I observe that calling tune_new_gbm() is just part of the process. Before it, quick_simulation() is called. However, the comments say To tune a new model that fits the SNV count in our dataset we first simulate a new dataset from WGS data for which the sig3 is known from WGS analysis and is more reliable. If quick simulations are based on Sig3 data, Is this step limiting our ability to detect other signatures beyond Sig3?

Thanks a lot in advance

@xiw588
Copy link

xiw588 commented Mar 8, 2024

Hi @jpuntomarcos Are you eventaublly able to run this? I am running into the same issues. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants