You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We are interested in training a new model for a different gene panel; the guide helped a lot.
We want to detect other signatures beyond Sig3. I have read that we can use colname_truth_tag parameter in tune_new_gbm(). Default value is is_sig3, Which are the alternative values? is_sig4, is_sig5, etc?
Also, following the test_tune_example.R I observe that calling tune_new_gbm() is just part of the process. Before it, quick_simulation() is called. However, the comments say To tune a new model that fits the SNV count in our dataset we first simulate a new dataset from WGS data for which the sig3 is known from WGS analysis and is more reliable. If quick simulations are based on Sig3 data, Is this step limiting our ability to detect other signatures beyond Sig3?
Thanks a lot in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
We are interested in training a new model for a different gene panel; the guide helped a lot.
We want to detect other signatures beyond Sig3. I have read that we can use
colname_truth_tag
parameter intune_new_gbm()
. Default value isis_sig3
, Which are the alternative values?is_sig4
,is_sig5
, etc?Also, following the
test_tune_example.R
I observe that callingtune_new_gbm(
) is just part of the process. Before it,quick_simulation()
is called. However, the comments sayTo tune a new model that fits the SNV count in our dataset we first simulate a new dataset from WGS data for which the sig3 is known from WGS analysis and is more reliable
. If quick simulations are based on Sig3 data, Is this step limiting our ability to detect other signatures beyond Sig3?Thanks a lot in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: