Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ParseQueryAdapter for RecyclerView #128

Open
wangmengyan95 opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

ParseQueryAdapter for RecyclerView #128

wangmengyan95 opened this issue Jan 28, 2016 · 5 comments
Milestone

Comments

@wangmengyan95
Copy link
Contributor

We get several PRs about how to make ParseQueryAdapter support RecyclerView such as #98 #86 #72. The reason we don't merge them into master is because

  1. Some of them copy/paste too many codes from ParseQueryAdapter
  2. Some of them introduce too many new interfaces and will break back-compatibility.
    After discussion, we decide to abstract the way we load ParseObject from a ParseQuery. This is the core part of using an adapter to show the data from a ParseQuery. We will show how to use this new thing with ListView and RecyclerView by examples.
    We are blocked by the updates of bolts and facebook SDK for a while. Right now the problem has been solved.
    We are working on that and this feature will be shipped with the next release.
@ofuwape
Copy link

ofuwape commented Mar 19, 2016

Any update on the releasing v0.0.2 with this feature?

@mmarshak
Copy link

Hi, is there any update on release 0.0.2 that will support RecyclerView?

@d4rkc0de
Copy link

d4rkc0de commented Jan 3, 2017

It's almost a year, and no updates?

@tsvetann
Copy link

tsvetann commented Feb 3, 2017

Looking forward to the next version. Any updates?

@monajafi
Copy link

monajafi commented May 20, 2017

Why The recyclerView example did not included in version 0.0.2 ? Is it stable to use #130 sample code with version 0.0.2?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants