You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the moment, there is no good way to parse interlaced arrays:
a[0],b[0],c[0];a[1],b[1],c[1];a[2],b[2],b[3];...
And there is not even a bad way to print them.
How should the syntax look like?
I am inclined to this:
in "possible prefix" [ "%f,%(recB)f,%(recC)f;" ] "possible postfix";
having [ outside of quotes.
Or escaped: "[...]" ?
When to stop if the array records differ in capacity (NELM)? First record to fill up and leave the remaining input in the input buffer? Last record to fill up and drop overflow elements? End of matching input and drop overflow elements?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
dirk-zimoch
changed the title
New syntax needed for interlaced arrays
New syntax needed for interlaced arrays (aka tables)
Feb 22, 2019
At the moment, there is no good way to parse interlaced arrays:
a[0],b[0],c[0];a[1],b[1],c[1];a[2],b[2],b[3];...
And there is not even a bad way to print them.
How should the syntax look like?
I am inclined to this:
in "possible prefix" [ "%f,%(recB)f,%(recC)f;" ] "possible postfix";
having [ outside of quotes.
Or escaped: "[...]" ?
When to stop if the array records differ in capacity (NELM)? First record to fill up and leave the remaining input in the input buffer? Last record to fill up and drop overflow elements? End of matching input and drop overflow elements?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: