admin field width does not work (CSS specificity bug)

[brunocrosier]

Link to reproduction

No response

Payload Version

beta

Node Version

20

Next.js Version

beta

Describe the Bug

This line of CSS is explicitly setting width: 100%!important, meaning that when you do something like

admin: {
  width: '50%'
}

although the width: 50% is actually set on the element, the width: 100%!important wins out, and we can't have fields of custom width
the

Reproduction Steps

Create a collection and add

admin: {
  width: '50%'
}

to any field

### Adapters and Plugins

_No response_

[AlessioGr]

Can't reproduce this issue - works for me, see screenshot, Can you provide a reproduction / a field config where this issue happens?

[brunocrosier]

ah yes i'm sorry it seems like the issue is actually something else, and only happens when the widths of a field inside a row add up to 100%

{
            type: 'row',
            fields: [
                {
                    name: 'SKU',
                    type: 'text',
                    admin: {
                        width: '50%',
                    }
                },
                {
                    name: 'taxRate',
                    type: 'relationship',
                    relationTo: 'taxes',
                    hasMany: false,
                    admin: {
                        width: '50%',
                    }
                },
            ]
        },

So actually, the fix should be to change from flex-grow: 1; to flex: 1; (which is shorthand for also adding flex-shrink: 1; flex-basis: 0%;

[brunocrosier]

Created PR here: #7869

[GermanJablo]

Hi @brunocrosier. I still cannot reproduce.

Also, if I change flex-grow to flex like you did in your PR, the relationship doesn't hold if it's uneven (say 10% and 40%), but instead, they keep taking up half of each other.

Maybe you have some CSS of your own that could be conflicting?

[brunocrosier]

Hey @GermanJablo which version of payload v3 beta are you using?

[GermanJablo]

I checked out your PR

[brunocrosier]

Hmm.. I created my PR via the GitHub UI and I think it branched off of main rather than beta. That might be why..

I'm running 3.0.0-beta.94 and that's where I am seeing the issue

[tophermurphy]

I'm seeing the same issue on beta.94. It is because the css uses "gap". The gap adds space to the row children, so a row with 2 elements of 50% and a gap of 10px calculates out at 100% + 10px, thus overflowing the content.

Either switch "width" to "max-width", revert to the previous style with negative margins and padding or set the flex-wrap to nowrap.

Here is how the rows where handled in the previous version

.field-type.row .row__fields {
  display: flex;
  flex-wrap: wrap;
  width: calc(100% + var(--base));
  margin-left: calc(var(--base) * -0.5);
  margin-right: calc(var(--base) * -0.5);
}

.field-type.row .row__fields > * {
  flex-grow: 1;
  padding-left: calc(var(--base) * 0.5);
  padding-right: calc(var(--base) * 0.5);
}

[tophermurphy]

If you drop this in custom.scss file it has the widths working properly.

.field-type.row .row__fields {
    display: flex;
    flex-wrap: wrap;
    margin-left: calc(var(--base) * -0.5);
    margin-right: calc(var(--base) * -0.5);
    gap: 0;
  }

  .field-type.row .row__fields > * {
    flex-grow: 1;
    padding-left: calc(var(--base) * 0.5);
    padding-right: calc(var(--base) * 0.5);
  }

[GermanJablo]

@brunocrosier Do you want to update your PR to point to the Beta branch? The new path if I'm not mistaken is:
packages\ui\src\fields\Row\index.scss

Ideally, it would be good to have a test. If that's not possible, I would appreciate if you could do some verifications that flex: 1 doesn't cause any undesired behavior.

---

@tophermurphy thank you for your contribution. Let's first see if @brunocrosier 's solution fixes the problem, since it only changes 1 line of CSS

[brunocrosier]

@brunocrosier Do you want to update your PR to point to the Beta branch? The new path if I'm not mistaken is: packages\ui\src\fields\Row\index.scss

Ideally, it would be good to have a test. If that's not possible, I would appreciate if you could do some verifications that flex: 1 doesn't cause any undesired behavior.

@tophermurphy thank you for your contribution. Let's first see if @brunocrosier 's solution fixes the problem, since it only changes 1 line of CSS

Thanks I'll create a new PR pointing at beta and add some tests. Just pinged you on DIscord with some questions about how to run Payload in the beta branch. Cheers

[brunocrosier]

@brunocrosier Do you want to update your PR to point to the Beta branch? The new path if I'm not mistaken is: packages\ui\src\fields\Row\index.scss

Ideally, it would be good to have a test. If that's not possible, I would appreciate if you could do some verifications that flex: 1 doesn't cause any undesired behavior.

@tophermurphy thank you for your contribution. Let's first see if @brunocrosier 's solution fixes the problem, since it only changes 1 line of CSS

I've addressed this issue in this PR now and added some more tests: #7940

Reviews welcome!

[github-actions]

🚀 This is included in version v3.0.0-beta.104

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically locked.
Please open a new issue if this issue persists with any additional detail.