You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 9, 2023. It is now read-only.
Singh &al emphasize that the number of clusters should not be fixed, but also that domain-specific clustering methods may be used. Currently two intuitive rules are available, based on continuous and discrete versions of the same principle. While it might not usually be appropriate in practice, having a method available that simply imposes a fixed-distance cutoff, i.e. performs clustering without adjusting for the size and scale of each level set, could be useful for demonstration and comparison purposes.
I'm thinking about implementing this, but it's not a priority, and i wanted to check first!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Singh &al emphasize that the number of clusters should not be fixed, but also that domain-specific clustering methods may be used. Currently two intuitive rules are available, based on continuous and discrete versions of the same principle. While it might not usually be appropriate in practice, having a method available that simply imposes a fixed-distance cutoff, i.e. performs clustering without adjusting for the size and scale of each level set, could be useful for demonstration and comparison purposes.
I'm thinking about implementing this, but it's not a priority, and i wanted to check first!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: